Tag Archives for PLoS
Cameron Neylon responds to the allegations that PLoS is a pay-to-play vanity press: That an author pays model has the potential to create a conflict of interest is clear. That is why, within reputable publishers, structures are put in place … Continue reading →
30. April 2010 by Mr. Gunn
Categories: Uncategorized |
Tags: open access, PLoS, publishing |
6 comments
A discussion broke out recently on Friendfeed about online commentary on scientific articles. The discussions were interesting because, for the first time in recent memory, there was disagreement about something fundamental. I view this as an extremely positive sign that … Continue reading →
24. May 2009 by Mr. Gunn
Categories: Uncategorized |
Tags: commentary, friendfeed, open access, PLoS, ResearcherID |
15 comments
Online Engagement of Scientists with the literature: anonymity vs. ResearcherID
A discussion broke out recently on Friendfeed about online commentary on scientific articles. The discussions were interesting because, for the first time in recent memory, there was disagreement about something fundamental. I view this as an extremely positive sign that … Continue reading →
24. May 2009 by Mr. Gunn
Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: commentary, friendfeed, open access, PLoS, ResearcherID | 15 comments