Derek Lowe is dipping into the debate on online science commentary at his site at Corante, In The Pipeline. From the perspective of a graduate student, it’s a fantastic idea. Instead of waiting for the few scientific meeting and conventions a year to interact with peers and senior researchers in our field, we could potentially receive and respond to comments daily. John Vu is criticizing Eagleman & Holcombe for failing to make any mention of blogging whatsoever, despite the obvious examples, such as Hubmed. I’ve written before about the neat feature of RSS feeds of literature queries.
Recent Posts
- How to root & install a custom ROM on the AT&T Nexus S running Android OS 2.3.4 (Windows or Ubuntu 11.04)
- Criticize tag clouds if you must, but this does give you a good summary of my research at a glance
- Real innovation in scientific publishing
- Public anywhere is public everywhere.
- If I published in or reviewed for PLoS, I’d be pissed off too.
Blogroll
- Bench Marks
- Bioinformatics Zen
- dataisnature.com
- Freelancing science
- Genomics, Evolution, and Pseudoscience
- Health vs. Medicine
- HubLog
- Nascent
- Nature blogs, filtered
- Nature Precedings
- Notes from the biomass
- Oracy
- Partial Immortality
- PredictER Blog
- Research Remix
- ScienceRoll
- The Niche
- The Scientific Activist
- The Seven Stones
- VentureBeat Life Sciences
- What You’re Doing Is Rather Desperate
Mendeley Related Research
2
Readers
Readers
Higher Education Debate
Denham. (2009)
6
Readers
Readers
The entrepreneurial university: A debate
Baldini. (2006)
1
Readers
Readers
2
Readers
Readers
A European Policy for Electronic Publishing
Vitiello. (2001)

Recent Comments