Tag Archive for 'intelligence'

James Watson, the attention whore

James WatsonJames Watson said that some part of intelligence may be genetically determined, and, in support of this, says that there are differences which break down among racial lines. I haven’t seen the data, so I can’t comment on that point, but neither have the reporters. That doesn’t stop them from running to the presses with a dynamite headline like “Watson says black people are stupid”. (Did you pick up on how excited the reporter was to get this interview?)I also find it hard to believe that a smart fella like Watson, who has been previously misquoted as saying things like “people should abort their gay children”, didn’t realize that this would be sensationalized. So, based on this, I’d like to offer to him the Attention Whore Lifetime Achievement Merit Badge. Jim, please pick it up to the left of this post, thank you.

Now, I don’t particularly like painting a target on my head, but I dislike even more the implicit suggestion that there is no reason anyone would study the genetic basis of unless he was trying to push a racist agenda. I don’t like the fact that even seeming to defend him is enough evidence to brand one a “hidden” racist in the eyes of the media. It’s implicit censorship of the idea that maybe people are actually different on a genetic level, and says more about the hidden agenda or beliefs of the people who replace “different” with “better” than it does about the researcher who uncovers those differences. Those who wish to believe that everyone is identical on a genetic level should avoid at all costs having a conversation with Watson’s schizophrenic son. I think having a son with a mental disorder gives you an excellent reason to want to study the of mental development. To figure out what happened to his son is one of the main reasons the Genome project was started, so one would have to be fairly heartless to imply that Watson instead has a racist agenda.

If you want to read more about this, start here:
Here’s Watson’s interview, here’s Watson’s statement, here’s some data on IQ, race, and socioeconomic status, and here’s a book for you to read.

Which came first, the blank slate or the writer?

Mardi Gras comes and goes here in New Orleans and I miss out on all the controversy. I think I have discovered the real reason some people get so queasy when talk of of arises.

If the comments on this forum are in any way indicative of how the dialog will go on the larger scale(and I suspect that they are) the discussion will be like every other debate about , cloning, or pre-emptive medical intervention.

The anti side will be ignorant of the basic science and will be composed of liberal art majors chattering about how wrong it is to “tamper with nature” and religious right-wingers chattering about how wrong it is to “tamper with god’s creation.” The pro side will be composed of those who understand the basic science involved and realize that this really is nothing new and nature has been doing it all along, but this side will be totally unable to communicate with the anti side because:

1)the anti side is ignorant of the basic science.

2)the anti side doesn’t really want a reasoned debate anyways, they just want to yell and scream about how wrong it is.

[ EDIT 10-2007] It took me a long time to realize that not everyone agrees that rationality should be the basis for all policy decisions. If you want to get across to those people, you have to speak to their heart, not their head.

Genetic influences on intelligence and cross-cultural concepts of beauty.

Razib has invited me to take my seat at his roundtable, and I am honored to do so. Upon logging in to write my first post, I noticed that 4 out of the 5 most recent pings were from “Gene Expression contributors are racists” discussions. Of course, that’s just par for the course when you’re discussing such emotionally charged issues as genetic(i.e. racial) influences on intelligence and cross-cultural concepts of beauty.

[EDIT 2-12-2007 - I regret that I kinda flaked out after this, but I'm glad to see that Gene Expression is still around.