Derek Lowe is dipping into the debate on online science commentary at his site at Corante, In The Pipeline. From the perspective of a graduate student, it’s a fantastic idea. Instead of waiting for the few scientific meeting and conventions a year to interact with peers and senior researchers in our field, we could potentially receive and respond to comments daily. John Vu is criticizing Eagleman & Holcombe for failing to make any mention of blogging whatsoever, despite the obvious examples, such as Hubmed. I’ve written before about the neat feature of RSS feeds of literature queries.
This post is about debate, eagleman, policy, publishingRecent Comments
- ResearchBlogging.org News » Blog Archive » Reactions to BPR3 from across the web on Bloggers for Peer-Reviewed Research Reporting is working on a post aggregation system.
- Mr. Gunn on An open letter to the medical community.
- John Doe on An open letter to the medical community.
- Mr. Gunn on An open letter to the medical community.
- No name given [URL deleted] on An open letter to the medical community.
Recent Posts
Blogroll
- Bench Marks
- Bioinformatics Zen
- dataisnature.com
- Freelancing science
- Genomics, Evolution, and Pseudoscience
- Health vs. Medicine
- HubLog
- Nascent
- Nature blogs, filtered
- Nature Precedings
- Notes from the biomass
- Oracy
- Partial Immortality
- PredictER Blog
- Research Remix
- ScienceRoll
- The Niche
- The Scientific Activist
- The Seven Stones
- VentureBeat Life Sciences
- What You’re Doing Is Rather Desperate
0 Responses to “Online, real-time, science commentary”