Consider that creation vs. evolution shouldn’t even be a debate we’re having. Michael Shermer and the philosophical debates over the existence of god are something I can tolerate, because that’s what philosophers are for, but the idea that we should have a scientific debate about creationism vs. evolution is every bit as ridiculous as a “lunarist” debate would be, except this time Buzz Aldrin can’t help us.
Tags: Buzz Aldrin, creationism, lunarist, Michael Shermer, revisionismRecent Comments
- uggs on sale on I’ve joined Mendeley as Community Liaison.
- Mr. Gunn on Real innovation in scientific publishing
- Joanne Manaster (@sciencegoddess) on Real innovation in scientific publishing
- Inundata – DataCite 2011, recap on About Me
- Mr. Gunn on I’ve worked out a method for doing immunohistochemistry (IHC) on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) sections of bone.
Recent Posts
- How to root & install a custom ROM on the AT&T Nexus S running Android OS 2.3.4 (Windows or Ubuntu 11.04)
- Criticize tag clouds if you must, but this does give you a good summary of my research at a glance
- Real innovation in scientific publishing
- Public anywhere is public everywhere.
- If I published in or reviewed for PLoS, I’d be pissed off too.
Blogroll
- Bench Marks
- Bioinformatics Zen
- dataisnature.com
- Freelancing science
- Genomics, Evolution, and Pseudoscience
- Health vs. Medicine
- HubLog
- Nascent
- Nature blogs, filtered
- Nature Precedings
- Notes from the biomass
- Oracy
- Partial Immortality
- PredictER Blog
- Research Remix
- ScienceRoll
- The Niche
- The Scientific Activist
- The Seven Stones
- VentureBeat Life Sciences
- What You’re Doing Is Rather Desperate
Mendeley Related Research
1
Readers
Readers
3
Readers
Readers
How We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God
Shermer. (2003)
0
Readers
Readers
Shermer's Last Law.
Shermer. (2002)
1
Readers
Readers
michael shermer: the pattern behind self-deception
Shermer. (2010)
1
Readers
Readers

0 Responses to “Are you a Lunarist?”